Fulton, KY 1850 Federal Census - Transcribers Notes This Census was transcribed by Lee Ann Workman and Has Not Been Proofread Yet for the USGenWeb Census Project, http://www.usgwcensus.org. Copyright 2000 by Lee Ann Workman ************************************************************************ USGENWEB ARCHIVES CENSUS PROJECT NOTICE: These electronic pages may NOT be reproduced in any format for profit or presentation by any other organization or persons. Persons or organizations desiring to use this material, must obtain the written consent of the contributor, or the legal representative of the submitter, and contact the listed USGenWeb archivist with proof of this consent. The submitter has given permission to the USGenWeb Archives to store the file permanently for free access. http://www.usgwarchives.net/ ************************************************************************ Page Row Column Comment 110B 42 4 I think this is a 26, but its not entirely legible. 111B 1 Hotel' is written vertically across the column, but I can't tell exactly which rows it is supposed to apply to. 112A 42 9 England or Ireland, I can't tell which. 115B 32 9 the M is the only clear letter. Could be Miss? 116A 31 12 There is a mark here that has been scribbled out. 122B 8 9 It looks like the last two letters may have been crossed out on the census. 122B 10 9 Me' is my best guess - could be something else. 123B 33 4 This entry is illegible. 124B 5 3 The name in the line below was originally written here, then crossed out and 'Martha "' written in. 124B 38 12 There was a mark here that was crossed out. 126B 29 5 This is an F on the census, but I think obviously its meant to be an M, since the person's name is Joseph and a profession is listed. 127B 1 12 There is a mark here on the census, but it looks like an extraneous mark and is not consistent with the marks the census taker has been using. 127B 8 3a This entry has a blot on it, but it looks like James. 130A 33 9 Ky corrected to Do on census. 133A 9 9 This looks like it was Ky then corrected to Do, but it could just as easily be Do corrected to Ky. 133A 15 13 There is an entry here that has been crossed out and is illegible. 134A 8 2 This is entered as 338 on the census, but so is the next one, so I think this should be 337. 134B 21 9 This looks like Ky corrected to Do, but it could just as easily be Do corrected to Ky. 140A 42 9 There is no entry on the census. 140B 29 3 Very faded; looks like Vent but could be anything. 140B 32 3 Very faded; looks like McLeburn but could be anything that starts with McL. 141A 9 9 The entry here is scribbled out. 142A 3 2 Census taker doubled his number here. 143A 10 thru 12 18 thru 20 Lines 18 through 20, columns 10 through 12 are damaged on the census and are unreadable. 143B 14 7 There are two Do's on this line, as if the above entry were two separate professions. 143B 23 4 The second digit is too faded to see. 144A 1 3a The final 'a' is written in as a correction above the word. 144A 42 9 This entry is unreadable, but looks like it begins with an 'I'. 145A 19 4 Kind of smudged; could be 6 months. 150B 24 4 The second digit has been written over; looks like a two, but could be otherwise.